Tuesday, April 23, 2019

What Cup?


What Was The Cup Jesus Asked His Father To Remove – REALLY?

Luke 22:42 Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.

What if the cup that Jesus asked the Father to remove from him when He was in the Garden of Gethsemane, was not what has been taught for so long? What if, He was speaking of the 'cup' that He was drinking at that moment, ("...this cup...') rather than the cup he was about to drink – the cross?
It has been assumed that this suffering in the Garden of Gethsemane, was because of either fear or dread of the cross. That although He was God, He was also a human, and as such, it would be only natural for Him to dread what He was about to face. But I would like to propose something else entirely. I suggest that what He was asking His Father to relieve Him of was not at all the cross, but that there was something weighing on Him that He wanted help with so that He could, in fact, make it to the cross.
Jesus’ purpose had always been to make it to the cross. In fact, remember what Jesus did when He began to make it known to His disciples how He was going to suffer and be killed, but Peter took Him aside and rebuked Him saying "Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee?" Jesus said, "Get thee behind me Satan ....

Matthew 16:21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how   that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.
22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.
23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

If Satan had been tempting Jesus’s flesh, in the garden, not to go to the cross, He could have simply rebuked him then and there. No, I think something else was going on altogether.
After all. The purpose and goal of Jesus had always been to go to the cross and redeem mankind. I doubt that even His humanity would have distracted Him for one second from His goal.
Jesus understood that the reason He came to earth in the form of a man, was so that His body could bear the sins of the world. His body had been created for that purpose.

Hebrews 10:5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest (determine, choose or prefer [Strong’s]) not, but a body hast thou prepared me:

Jesus addressed this very issue and made His view known to Andrew and Phillip when He told them that the person who loved His life would lose it. Even though Jesus’ soul was troubled, which in the Greek is - tarasso, tar-as'-so - to stir or agitate (roil water):--trouble – yet He would in no way ask the Father to save Him from the very purpose for which He came.

John 12:20-28 And there were certain Greeks among them that came up to worship at the feast:
21 The same came therefore to Philip, which was of Bethsaida of Galilee, and desired him, saying, Sir, we would see Jesus
22 Philip cometh and telleth Andrew: and again Andrew and Philip tell Jesus.
23 And Jesus answered them, saying, The hour is come, that the Son of man should be glorified.
24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.
25 He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal
27 Now is my soul troubled; and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour.
28 Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.

In verse 27 Jesus made it abundantly clear – “what shall I say? Father save me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour.” This word ‘hour’ here, can have a figurative meaning and can mean a day or season. I believe in essence Jesus told Philip and Andrew, shall I ask the Father to save me from the very thing I came to do at this season?
The answer is a resounding No! This is seen from the next words He spoke – “Father glorify they name.” The Greek for the word ‘name’ here is – onoma, on'-om-ah a "name" (literally or figuratively) (authority, character):-- called, (+ sur-)name(-d).
            God’s name, authority, and character would be glorified when Jesus did the will of the Father and did what He was sent to earth to do. He was not about to ask the Father to keep Him from doing that which would glorify and honor Him! So why would we think that He turned around and did so in the Garden of Gethsemane?
            John 13:1 lets us know that Jesus knew that the time for Him to depart out of this world, or that is, His time to die had arrived and that He loved those He was going to die for until the very end. He was not about to try and get out of dying on the cross to redeem them!
           
John 13:1 Now before the feast of the passover, when Jesus knew that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end.

He knew that if He did not die and return to the Father victorious over sin and death, no man could be saved and have the Holy Spirit living in them.

John 16:7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you

He came for a purpose, took on human form, which was far beneath the glory He had had before coming to earth and bore the restrictions of human flesh, for a specific purpose, and I don’t think He ever considered not going through with what He came to accomplish.

1 John 3:8 … For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

Now, of course, this makes perfect sense. But we cannot just ignore what Jesus said in the garden about ‘letting this cup pass.’ Okay, fair enough. So, let’s look closer at what we’re told actually took place. Consider what is said in Matthew and see if you do not find a possible key to unlock something that has been overlooked.

Matthew 26:37 And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy.
38 Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me.
39 And he went a little further, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt.
42 He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done

Alright, so the first thing we are told here is how that He took Peter and the two sons of Zebedee and began to be sorrowful and very heavy. Pause here and consider what this means. The word 'sorrowful' here, in the Hebrew, means - to distress; reflexively or passively, to be sad:--cause grief, grieve, be in heaviness, (be) sorrow(-ful), be (make) sorry.
The word 'heavy' means - (to be sated to loathing); to be in distress (of mind) ....
Then in verse 38, Jesus said that His soul was exceeding sorrowful even unto death!
The meaning for these words 'exceeding sorrowful' in the Hebrew is - grieved all around, i.e. intensely sad:--exceeding (very) sorry(-owful).

His 'soul' was grieved and intensely sad. Do you notice that in all these things that we are told Jesus was feeling and experiencing, fear or dread are not once mentioned? At that exact moment our Lord was distressed. He was grieving and sorrowful. He was sated or filled to loathing.
According to https://www.websters1913.com/words/loath the meaning of the word 'loathing' is - Loath"ingn. Extreme disgust; a feeling of aversion, nausea, abhorrence, or detestation.
Abhorrence is - Ab*hor"rence (?), n. Extreme hatred or detestation; the feeling of utter dislike.
What was it that He such extreme hatred of? We are told in the book of Hebrews that while Jesus endured the cross, He did despise the shame. But unless He was thinking ahead, while in the Garden of Gethsemane, He had not yet reached the cross.
Still, there in the garden, there was not only a loathing inside of Him but He was exceedingly sorrowful as well.
See how it is recorded in Luke.
Luke 22:41-4441 And he was withdrawn from them about a stone's cast, and kneeled down, and prayed,
42 Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.
43 And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him.
44 And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly: and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground.

This agony that he was suffering is the word 'agonia,' in the Hebrew. It means - a struggle (prop. the state), that is, (fig.) anguish;- agony.
Though we are not told His thoughts, we see that there was a struggle going on. There was so much going on inside of Him that He called upon His Father for help. What was the result? An angel appeared and strengthened him. After receiving strength from the angel, he was able to go through the agony that was so severe that He sweat as it were great drops of blood that fell to the ground. Yes, this was not just dampness on his skin, but sweat so great that it literally fell from him to the earth!!
Now, let me tell you what I think was probably happening in the garden that day that was so hard for the Savior to bear, and why. I will leave you to your own conclusions but think this is worth consideration.
I believe that the ‘cup’ that He asked the Father to remove from Him was a cup He was having to drink in that moment. And I believe what was happening to Him was that the sin of the world being transferred to his sinless body!
Why do I think this? This is based on the belief and understanding that the sins of the world would have to be in our Savior’s body before He received the punishment for those sins.
The Bible tells us that not only did the Father put all of our sins on Christ, but it says that the Savior actually ‘became’ sin, even though He had never sinned Himself. I do not believe that Jesus was punished for our sins before this transfer took place. But rather that He was carrying our sins in His body, and had become sin, at the time He was punished for those sins.
            I do not believe that one thorn was placed into his scalp, one fist hit His face, or one lash from the Roman whip bore into His flesh before our sins had been transferred to Him and He had become sin for our sakes. He was being beaten and punished for our sins, so I conclude our sin had been out on Him at this point.

2 Corinthians 5:21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.
Isaiah 53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
1Peter 2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.

In the past, I had thought about when Jesus took our sins, but as perhaps is the case with many, I had never thought it out. I didn’t know if He had borne our sins for a few seconds on the cross or for many hours. But I had not considered that if all the suffering He suffered from the time He was taken to Pilot until He said, ‘It is finished,’ was punishment for my sin, then my sin surely would have been on Him during that time.
If this is the case, then when did the transfer of the sins of the world onto our Lord take place?
Let’s do some reasoning, folks. If He was sinless, holy, and undefiled, the perfect lamb, before our sins were transferred to His body – and if – He was led straight from the Garden of Gethsemane to the Sanhedrin and Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled, and there He was spit on and ‘buffeted,’ – in other words – if He began to be punished for our sins by the scribes and elders – then – it stands to reason that our sins were on Him at that time.
With this Belief in mind, I conclude that He took on our sins sometime before leaving the garden where the torture began and I find nothing in scripture portraying this event until I see His agony in the garden.

Matthew 26:67 Then did they spit in his face, and buffeted him; and others smote him with the palms of their hands,

Thus, I suggest that Jesus was pure and undefiled when He entered the Garden of Gethsemane but that as the sins of the world were transferred onto His sinless body, it was a serious shock to His entire being.
Before this transfer took place, He knew sin existed, but He had never sinned. He was pure and blameless. Since, He had never sinned, He had never had to endure the feelings of uncleanness, guilt, or condemnation. He had never had to feel godless. However, God has no fellowship with darkness. Sin separates us from God. So, Jesus would have also had to bear being separated from the Father at the very time He was suffering the most excruciating pain.
Again, I suggest that He entered the Garden of Gethsemane in all of His holiness, pure, and undefiled. However, as soon as He would leave the garden, He would be in the hands of the soldiers who were going to torture Him. And it would be the body of sin that would be tortured and killed. Therefore, I believe that it was the onslaught of all the evil sins of the world being poured, as it were, into Jesus’ body that caused such grief and heaviness that He called out to the Father for help, so that He did not give out before He could make it to the cross.
Take a look and consider what the transfer of our sins onto Christ caused Him to bear.

Isaiah 53:4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.

Let’s look more deeply at what these things really were. Look at the Hebrew meanings of some of these words.

Griefs = choliy, khol-ee' - malady, anxiety, calamity:--disease, grief, (is) sick(-ness).
            Wow! Just looking at the word ‘griefs’ look what we find! Along with our sin being on Him, He also bore the maladies, anxieties, calamities, diseases, griefs and sickness’ that result from our sins! Whew! If this means He actually had our diseases in Him, surely He would have been tremendously weakened physically! But even if you believed this to be speaking figuratively in some way, surely this was terrible suffering!
            Add to that, bearing our anxieties! Consider who ‘anxiety’ is defined by – www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anxiety
1 apprehensive uneasiness or nervousness usually over an impending or anticipated ill a state of being 
(2 ) medical an abnormal and overwhelming sense of apprehension and fear often marked by physical signs (such as tension, sweating, and increased pulse rate), by doubt concerning the reality and nature of the threat, and by self-doubt about one's capacity to cope with it
bmentally distressing concern or interest
ca strong desire sometimes mixed with doubt, fear, or uneasiness….

What a burden to find yourself suddenly bearing! Jesus was God. He had no reason to be uneasy, nervous, mentally distressed, or overwhelmed by apprehension! And yet He bore our anxieties. And notice in the definition given, it says that an overwhelming sense of apprehension and fear is often marked by such things as sweating and increased pulse rate. Now, although Jesus Himself had no such anxieties, if He bore ours, it would be no wonder that he would loathe the very feelings of such things. And surely, He would want to be free from the feelings of such infirmities!
Yet by bearing it, He could have sympathy for what we go through.

Hebrews 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.
‘Touched with the feeling’ here means - to feel "sympathy" with … have compassion, …. (Strong’s)
Infirmities – astheneia,as-then'-i-ah - feebleness (of mind or body); by implication, malady; morally, frailty:--disease, infirmity, sickness, weakness.
And He carried our sorrows!

Sorrows - mak-obe' sometimes makcowb {mak-obe' - anguish or (figuratively) affliction:--grief, pain, sorrow
            So, the sorrow he bore for us was strong enough to include the meaning of anguish, which https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/anguish says is ‘extreme unhappiness caused by physical or mental suffering.
            How about the sorrow of every broken heart?

                        Please, never again say that God does not understand!
He bore not only the sins of the world but their suffering too!

            (v6) The iniquities of us all were laid on Him.
The Hebrew word for iniquities is - avon, aw-vone' -  … perversity, i.e. (moral) evil:--fault, iniquity, mischeif, punishment (of iniquity), sin.
            Now think about a time when you did something wrong that made you feel guilty, ashamed and unclean. Maybe even the first time that ever happened. Maybe telling a lie as a child. It felt pretty bad, especially the first time, didn’t it?
            Well, Jesus had never once sinned. But in that pure, innocent state, he received every sin ever committed and He surely felt the guilt and shame of it all. Surely, He hated, loathed and despised all of the filth that He was now having to bear! And surely, He hated the enemy, Lucifer, known as Satan, who continuously seduced God’s creation to sin and bring them into the bondage of so many mental and emotional pains and distresses! No wonder our Lord was agitated and may have experienced an inner war and turmoil!
 And if this transfer of our sins and sufferings happened in the Garden of Gethsemane, it would explain the agony he was going through! This must have been one of the most amazing, most horrible things Jesus ever suffered. He had never experienced sin! He was love and in him was the light of the world, but he chose to take on all that was evil and dark in mankind.

The Bible tells us he literally was made sin!

There is not a human being on the face of the earth who can comprehend what it might feel like to have every vile, perverted, filthy sin, ever committed, stuffed in his body all at once. Not one of us can fathom what it would be like to feel the guilt and shame of horrendous evil, when you had been nothing but good, pure, and sinless throughout all of time! Can you imagine our sinless Lord having the sin of rape - or child abuse - or torture, put on him, only to name a few? How could our pure Savior bear even one of these things, let alone, ALL the sins of the world?
The stress, distress, and anguish were so great that “his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground.” (Luke 22:44)
https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/hematidrosis-hematohidrosis#1 tells about a condition that sounds like what our Lord suffered. It is a condition called Hematidrosis. (Quote) Hematidrosis, or hematohidrosis, is a very rare medical condition that causes you to ooze or sweat blood from your skin when you're not cut or injured. People who have hematidrosis may sweat blood from their skin. It usually happens on or around the face, but the skin might be lining the inside of your body, too, like in your nose, mouth, or stomach. The skin around the bloody area may swell temporarily.
Crying tears of blood is related. It's called hemolacria. Bleeding from the ears is called blood otorrhea.
Hematidrosis can look like blood, bloody sweat, or sweat with droplets of blood in it. 
The bleeding usually stops on its own, and it's not serious, although it can make you dehydrated. And, of course, it can be disturbing.
Doctors don't know exactly what triggers hematidrosis, in part because it's so rare. They think it could be related to your body's "fight or flight" response.
            Let me say here that this makes me think of what could well have been going on with the onset of the sins of the world being transferred to Christ’s body – this fight or flight – response. Surely everything in Him would have wanted to fight against this onslaught of evil for it went against everything He was. He would want to be separated from it as quickly as possible. He was completely opposed to the very sin that He now bore. If Jesus was not asking the Father to remove those sins, since He knew He had to make it to the cross with them, He may have been asking the Father to either relieve Him of the extremely strong emotional response to them, that being the feelings of uncleanness, guilt, shame and condemnation, or perhaps the cup that He was asking God to remove was the effect all this was having on His body, the tremendous stress that was causing Him to sweat, as it were, great drops of blood and perhaps was even causing dehydration to set in. If the stress became so much that His body couldn’t bear it and He was to die, then He would not make it to the cross, and He was determined to get there.
            So, he asked God to remove that cup. When He did, an angel from Heaven appeared and strengthened Him. I believe this is key. If the angel strengthening Him was the answer to His prayer, then it seems this is what He was asking for, in essence, ‘don’t let me bear this without strength.’          But let us go on a little more in considering the condition of Hematidrosis, which sounds like what Jesus was suffering.
(Quote) Tiny blood vessels in the skin break open. The blood inside them may get squeezed out through sweat glands, or there might be unusual little pockets within the structure of your skin. These could collect the blood and let it leak into follicles (where the hair grows) or on to the skin's surface.
Sometimes it seems to be caused by extreme distress or fear, such as facing death, torture, or severe ongoing abuse. It's probably where the term "sweating blood," meaning a great effort, comes from.
Indeed, an angel came and strengthened Him. Without that help, He may not have been able to bear the physical attacks that He would have to bear on top of all the internal suffering, in the hours ahead. Without at least some physical relief he may have passed out if not died. And the Father would not let that happen.
Dehydrated, stressed to the point of sweating blood, physically weakened perhaps to the point of His body almost giving out, distracted, and oppressed in mind and spirit by all the filth that was laid on Him, He might not have been able to take the whipping, the crown of thorns, being hit by grown men, having some of His beard ripped out of His face, carrying a cross and then having nails driven into His hands and feet, without dying too soon without the help the angle brought.
No. I do not believe that for one second, our Lord and Savior was asking to be kept from the cross, but rather to be relieved from a cup He was drinking in the garden so that He could make it to the completion of His mission, perhaps with a little emotional strength and some extra physical strength.
And He did make it!! Consider what He did!
People think of Jesus as pure and holy. AND HE WAS! They think of his precious blood being pure and holy. AND IT WAS! - HOWEVER - When He took our sin in his body, when He became sin, the blood that flowed from his body on the cross, was blood contaminated with OUR sin! The body of sin was dying, and our sins were being washed away in the flow of his blood on that day!
This is why the born-again child of God can speak of being washed in the blood of the lamb. Our sin was washed away, in the blood that flowed from Christ on Calvary!

Romans 7:24-25 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? 25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord ….

Colossians 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:
Leviticus 17:11-12 For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.
12 Therefore I said unto the children of Israel, No soul of you shall eat blood, neither shall any stranger that sojourneth among you eat blood.
Romans 5:9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.
He bore our sins in his own body. That body was beaten and tortured. He suffered for the sins that we did, that were put on him! That body of death (physical death and separation from God mentally and spiritually as well) was pierced with a sword. Blood flowed out and the body of sin died so that we might live! Look at how the psalmist described it -
Psalms 22:11- 24 Be not far from me; for trouble is near; for there is none to help.
12 Many bulls have compassed me: strong bulls of Bashan have beset me round.
13 They gaped upon me with their mouths, as a ravening and a roaring lion.
14 I am poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint: my heart is like wax; it is melted in the midst of my bowels.
15My strength is dried up like a potsherd; and my tongue cleaveth to my jaws; and thou hast brought me into the dust of death.

Does this not sound like dehydration? – “My tongue cleaveth to my jaws”

16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.
17 I may tell all my bones: they look and stare upon me.18They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.
18 But be not thou far from me, O LORD: O my strength, haste thee to help me.
19 Deliver my soul from the sword; my darling from the power of the dog.
20 Save me from the lion's mouth: for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns
22 I will declare thy name unto my brethren: in the midst of the congregation will I praise thee.
23 Ye that fear the LORD, praise him; all ye the seed of Jacob, glorify him; and fear him, all ye the seed of Israel.
24 For he hath not despised nor abhorred the affliction of the afflicted; neither hath he hid his face from him; but when he cried unto him, he heard.

But consider too, the pain that was probably greater than all other, that our precious Savior suffered. One thing Jesus had always been able to count on was the presence of his heavenly Father, who he had been one with throughout all of eternity. The Father had been with him every moment of his earth life. He had guided him, showed him what to do, strengthened him and encouraged him. Even though he had become man, yet up until our sin was put on Him and He became sin, His condition was as described in Colossians.
Colossians 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.
Colossians 1:19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;
He and His Father were one and the Holy Spirit dwelled in him. He was human, but a sinless human, so there was nothing to prevent perfect fellowship between himself and the Father. But when our sin entered His body, the Father separated Himself from Him.
Isaiah 59:2 But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have his his face from you, that he will not hear you
This was probably more painful than anything Jesus suffered! When our sins entered His sinless body His fellowship with the Father left as well! I would thin all of this would have been enough to cause a human body to collapse! And what did Jesus do when finally on the cross? Matthew 27:46 and about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying Eli, Eli, Lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
Of course, Jesus knew the reason God had forsaken Him. I think that perhaps when he used the word “why” it was more of a rhetorical question, a one-word call for God’s attention, as if to say – ‘Do you remember why? Remember why! You know why! The ‘why’ is because I am doing your will! See here! I have done it! I have born their sins just as we agreed on before we created them. You have forsaken me – why? – you know why!
(This is also quoted in Psalms 22)
God had turned away from His son, and it was excruciating. But why was He going through it? He and the Father both knew why! Hallelujah!
So whether you come to the same conclusion that I have come to about what I believe was most going on in the Garden of Gethsemane and what the cup was that Jesus was really referring to, I hope you have given more thought as to what our Savior suffered for us.

Below is a little more study on what He did for us.

Isaiah 53:5-12 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
Isaiah 53:7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.
8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.
9 And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.
11 He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.
12 Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

Wounded = chalal, khaw-lal' - properly, to bore, i.e. (by implication) to wound, to dissolve; figuratively, to profane (a person, place or thing), to break (one's word), to begin (as if by an "opening wedge"); … begin (X men began), defile, … pollute, (cast as) profane (self), … slay (slain), sorrow, stain, wound.
Bruised = daw-kaw' - to crumble; transitively, to bruise (literally or figuratively):--beat to pieces, break (in pieces), bruise, contrite, crush, destroy, humble, oppress, smite
Iniquitiesavon, aw-vone' - perversity, i.e. (moral) evil:--fault, iniquity, mischeif, punishment (of iniquity), sin.
Chastisement – muwcar, moo-sawr' - properly, chastisement; figuratively, reproof, warning or instruction; also restraint:--bond, chastening ((-eth)), chastisement, check, correction, discipline, doctrine, instruction, rebuke.

(English) Chastisement https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chastisement - Definition of chastise

1to censure severely CASTIGATE
2to inflict punishment on (as by whipping)
Oppressed = nagas, naw-gas' - a primitive root; to drive (an animal, a workman, a debtor, an army); by implication, to tax, harass, tyrannize:--distress, driver, exact(-or), oppress(-or ….
Afflicted = `anah, aw-naw' - through the idea of looking down or browbeating); to depress literally or figuratively, transitive or intransitive (in various applications, as follows):--abase self, afflict(-ion, self), … chasten self, deal hardly with, defile, exercise, force, gentleness, humble (self), hurt, … weaken, X in any wise.

Monday, March 18, 2019

Heterosexuality versus Homosexuality

Heterosexuality versus Homosexuality
God’s Design and Purpose in the Creation of Man and the Marital Union
by: Rebecca R. Brown

Humanity’s sexuality was designed by God. It is an intricate part of each human being. It will not be ignored, nor should it be. However, it should be understood in light of God’s purpose and design.
God is not haphazard in the things that He does. He acts with purpose and is meticulously detailed in His design, leaving nothing to chance. He never threw a bunch of stars or planets into the sky to see where they would go. He made certain things for specific purposes, to fulfill a plan which He had before He began the creation of our world. What He did do is utterly amazing. Our solar system is an incredible system created by an extraordinarily loving God, who saw to it that everything was in perfect order before there was life on planet Earth before He created man in His own image and placed him here to live in peace.
What is peace?
According to Webster's 1913 Dictionary, it is –
Peace =... to make an agreement …
A state of quiet or tranquility, freedom from disturbance or agitation; calm; repose; …

God’s divine plan for all things is for all to work in harmony – the absence of war for
1. mind and will
2. body and soul
3. physical body as opposed to sickness
4. man and life
5 family
6. man and God
7. God and man
The peace that God intended for His man would be for all things to function after His intended order or arrangement. Man has caused himself many discomforts and problems by not following God’s plan or obeying His voice. Consider how beautifully He set our world in order. Before man sinned against God, the atmosphere was perfect and the vegetation on earth did not even need rain in order to receive the moisture it needed to live and grow.

Genesis 2:5+6 … for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no man to till the ground.
6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.

mist - ( in the sense of enveloping); a fog:– mist, vapor (Strong’s Exhaustive Con.)
from - prop. a part of; hence (prep.) from out of in many senses … (Strong’s Exhaustive Con.)

One can imagine that with mist, or moisture coming up out of the earth, that the roots of the plants would receive moisture even before it was seen on the surface of the land. Today farmers depend on rain to fall from the sky and hope and pray there will be enough to soak down far enough into the earth to reach the roots so that the plants will be able to live and grow. Imagine what a difference there would be if all things worked according to the original design of Father God!
What of the creation of man? Would not man function best if he too functioned according to his maker’s original design and purpose?
Man was created to be the image of God; a reflection of Him. Scripture tells us that man is the glory of God.

Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
1 Cor. 11:7 – For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: …

So, in the beginning, God set out to create man in His own image; man who would be the glory of God.
But what is God like?
In what way is man His reflection?
The word ‘God’ in Genesis 1:26 is the word elohiym; el-o-heem.’ It is the plural of the word elowahh, which means ‘God.’ Elohiym then, shows the plurality of God.

Deut. 6:4 Hear O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord.

If we look at the original Hebrew words that these were translated from, we can better see the plurality of the one and only, true and living God. The word, 'Lord' comes from the word Yehovah, which originally was without vowels and was most sacred. It means – (the) self-Existent or Eternal: Jehovah, Jewish national name of God: - Jehovah, the Lord. (Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance)
The word ‘God’ here, is - the word Elohiym. (Strong’s)
The word ‘one’ is - echad; a numeral from achad, prop. united, that is, one; or (as an
ordinal) first …. (Strong’s)
Considering the meanings of the words in this verse, we might see it as saying - Hear O Israel, our self-Existent, plural God, is united (one), Yehovah.
While such a God may be hard to fathom, can you imagine what it would be like to create a reflection of this God? But He did so when He created man!

Genesis 1:27 So God created man (a human being [Strong’s]) in his own image, in the image of God (elohiym [plural]) created he him, male and female created he them.

Now go with me to look at how God did this.

Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

First, God formed man out of the dust of the ground. Before He breathed into his nostrils, he was man! But he was a man without life. He was an amazing body consisting of everything he needed but with no life with which to activate or motivate him. Look at the awesomeness of the human body with a heart only slightly larger than a human fist that beats some 80,000 - 100,000 times a day and pumps about 2,000 gallons every day. There is a small intestine, coiled in the center of the abdominal cavity that is approx. 20 feet long, not to mention the large intestine.
We are told - https://www.fi.edu/heart/its-alive  that – “Each drop of blood is full of living red and white blood cells that deliver essential elements and remove harmful waste.”
There is the brain, that is like a magnificent computer. There are many essential organs and so much more. We understand that every organ has its own significant role to play in the health and well-being of the body. If any organ is misused or abused it can be harmful to the body and in some cases can bring about death.
Yet we understand that none of the internal organs would have operated without the breath of God bringing Adam’s body to life and setting it in motion.
When God breathed His very own breath, the breath of life, into Adam, this man became a living soul. Notice it does not say that he was not a man before God breathed into him. It does not say that the soul was the real person and the body just a house for him to live in. It does not say that there was a soul waiting for a body to live in. Though many such ideas have been considered and some believed, it is not what the Word of God says. We are told here in Genesis that when God breathed into the man’s nostrils, he became a living soul.
living - chay; alive, hence raw (flesh; flesh …) (Strong’s)
soul - nephesh; prop. a breathing creature (Strong’s)
The man that God had created became a living, breathing creature, the moment he received God’s breath of life! His flesh came to life as well as his mind. This first human, Adam, was created in the image of Father God, in that he was created with the ability to ‘father.’ But - the image of Elohiym was not yet complete!
The Word of God went on to say, “male and female created he them.” God, is a composite. That is to say -
1: made up of distinct parts or elements - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/composite

This being so, His image would also require the same. This is reflected in the human body which, as has been said, is made up of various parts all making up one complete body. But let us look at how God made His image and what this has to do with sexuality.

Genesis 2:18 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him
Genesis 2:20 … but for Adam there was not found a help meet for him.

Verse 18 is a key verse of great importance. It tells us that it was not good for the man to be alone and it tells us specifically God did to remedy the situation. It tells us that God said he was going to make an aid or help for Adam. The steps He took to do this had great purpose and significance.
There has been great misunderstanding based on this word ‘found.’ It was translated from the Hebrew – matsa; mean. prop. to come forth to, that is, appear or exist …. It is not suggesting that God and Adam looked all over the place and just couldn’t find a help meet that was suitable or that would please and satisfy Adam. It is telling us that a help mate for Adam did not yet exist. She had not yet ‘come forth,’ for God had a plan to create her from Adam’s own body. God already knew what He had planned to do even before He began creating the Earth.

Isaiah 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
Heb. 4:3 … although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.

Keep in mind that God’s intention was to create His own image. So, He began the process which He had planned from the beginning 

Genesis 2:21 - 24 And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall on Adam, and He slept: and he  took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
22 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man made he a woman, and brought her to the man.
23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of man.
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother. and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

The first thing we are told that God did, was to put the man to sleep. Adam had to submit himself into the hands of God, trusting himself and his life to God, in order to receive his bride. One day, in the future, Jesus would submit himself into the hands of His Father and be put to death, in order to receive His bride.
We can see many representations of the work of our Lord and Savior, in the process of creating the woman, including Adam’s sleep. Adam was put to sleep and interestingly, in the New Testament, Christians who died were referred to as being asleep; those who sleep in Christ. When a child of God dies, it is known that he will get up again, so sleep is a good description of his condition.
So, Adam being put to sleep is representative of the death Christ would suffer in order to receive a bride. While Adam slept God opened his side and took out a rib. It does not say a piece of a rib, but a rib.
While Jesus was on the cross His side was opened, and he shed blood. Not one of His bones were broken. As far as we know not one of Adam’s bones were broken in the process of the creation of his bride, but one was removed. Adam would say, after he was awakened, that the woman was both bone of his bones and flesh of his flesh. Apparently, some of Adam’s flesh was taken to be used in making the woman.
Verse 21 tells us that God “closed up the flesh instead thereof.” In Hebrew, the words ‘closed up” is the word - ‘cagar,’ meaning to shut up; figuratively - to surrender: close up, deliver (up) … The meaning suggests that God actually opened Adam’s flesh. He did not supernaturally remove it without an operation. Rather He put him to sleep and opened him up. If we took the meaning “to surrender up or to deliver up,” He might then be saying that Adam surrendered a piece of his flesh to the Lord to be used in creating his bride. The blood is in the flesh. The life of the flesh is in the blood.

Leviticus 17:14 For it is the life of all flesh; the blood of it is for the life thereof:... for the life of all flesh is the blood thereof:...

So, Adam shed blood in order to receive a bride that would truly be a part of himself. He gave lifeblood, or flesh with life in it. And the reason Adam’s flesh had life in it is because God had breathed that life into him.
Jesus would one day shed His blood in order to receive a bride for himself. Adam shed blood to receive his wife. After this, women would shed blood when the hymen was broken in intercourse. She would shed blood in order to receive her husband. Intercourse was never to happen without the covenant of marriage. I believe we can this to be a serious blood covenant.
Now here is something to consider.
Genesis 2:21 - …he  took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

flesh 1320 basar; flesh (from it’s freshness); by exten. body, person; also (by euphemism) the pudenda of a man: – …
Pudenda n. pl. ["., from pudendus that which one ought to be ashamed.] (anat.) the external organs of generation. [1913 Webster]
instead 8478 – tachath; the bottom (as depressed); only adv. below (often with prep. pref. underneath), in lieu of, etc:- as, beneath, …
If the words ‘closed up,’ means to ‘surrender up’ - could we be being told that Adam surrendered up flesh (‘instead thereof’ or from beneath) from the pudenda or genitals? Might this be the foreskin since one of the meanings for ‘flesh’ can be a euphemism, for the pudenda, or the genitals? If it was, then Adam would have shed blood from that which would be joined to his wife, as woman later would shed blood when first receiving her husband in sexual intercourse. If so, this could also be a clue as to why circumcision was chosen as the sign of the covenant between God and His people, Israel. This could be a symbol of two becoming one flesh.  It would also mean that woman was made from that which covered the most intimate part of the man. (Something to consider!)
When Adam saw his wife for the first time, he was looking at his own rib, his own flesh, and his own blood likely flowed through that flesh, - Adam’s blood. While woman was indeed an individual, yet at the same time, she was a very real part of her husband. They truly were one flesh.
Now Adam, being created by God, had never seen a marriage before. He had never seen a human father and mother together nor witnessed human birth. Yet with knowledge and understanding, he made this statement, upon seeing the woman “… This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”
When Adam first saw Eve, he knew what had taken place while he slept. He also knew that after this, God would not be putting every individual male to sleep to perform the same operation on them in order to receive a wife. He knew that children would come by means of the marital union of man and wife and that in due time a man should leave his parents and, by choice, join himself to one woman. He was to cleave to his wife and the two of them were to be considered literally one flesh.
To cleave, according to the Hebrew, is to – impinge, that is, cling or adhere …. There was a reason for this. Adam said “… Therefore shall a man …” Therefore - or because of the way God had taken Eve out of Adam and created her out of his own bone and flesh, that is to say, because God made the two of them to be one, which is in the likeness and image of God, every man after this is to view himself and his wife in the same manner.
God could have simply taken some dirt and created the woman in the way he had created Adam. But he chose to go through this intricate process in making the woman, for a reason. This reason had to do with the image of Himself that he was creating. If this is not understood and/or is overlooked or cast aside as unimportant, something of great importance is lost.
God had said that it was not good for the man to be alone, or that is, incomplete.
Now, we need to back and take a closer look at what God said about it not being good for man to be alone. The word ‘Alone,’ in the Greek, means something quite different than it does in the English language. ‘Alone’ - (Greek, Strong’s) – bad; prop. separation; by impl. a part of the body …. It was not good for Adam to be only a part of the body, but not yet completed, so what did God do? He created something to solve this problem. He created the thing that would complete the man and thus complete the image of God which man was meant to be. He created a woman to accomplish this!

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

In the creation of Adam is the evidence that God knew before he created him, that he would be creating a help that was suitable for him, who would complete him and the image of God. Adam was in the image of Father God, in that he was made with the ability to ‘father.’ He had all of his reproduction organs and was wired to respond to a woman before he had even laid eyes on one.
How do we know that it was woman he was meant to respond to? Because it was specifically a woman who God created to be his help meet, to complete him and receive his seed. There is no place provided in the male body, to receive seed. There was no other creation that was created to fulfill this purpose. Adam had the ability to unite with one other being who would complete him. This physical connection was to be through the physical union of two parts that when coming together would make one whole.
Adam had the ability to give seed, but there was no one to receive it and no garden for it to be planted in. He had all of his reproduction organs. The muscles, nerves, and blood vessels were all in working order to produce penile erection and the giving of seeds, capable of beginning new life when absorbed by a female ovum. All this was a part of Adam before his help mate appeared on the scene, because God had His plan set before he made Adam. He had known the end from the beginning. When Adam did see the mate that God had created for him, out of his own body, he saw the vessel for which these things were created; the vessel to carry his seed; in whom was the garden for it to be planted in; the incubator to hold it, and the vessel to nurture and protect it until it came forth as new life! He saw his counterpart; that which completed him.

1 Thes. 4:4 That every one of you should know how to possess his vessel in sanctification and honour.
1 Peter 3:7 Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honor unto the wife … that your prayers be not hindered.

Not only did God create this vessel for a specific purpose, but the scriptures tell us that every man – not only some men – but every man – was to know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor and to live with them according to knowledge. He does not suggest that there may be alternatives to God's plan and design, but there was a need for knowledge and understanding, which is greatly lacking in our society today.
God prepared this vessel perfectly, including every minute detail. Even the entrance to man’s garden was prepared with specific care and honor for both the man and the woman, who were one. The woman was created with a vagina that is self-cleansing, which will self-lubricate during sexual arousal, in order to reduce friction, when she receives the male penis. It cleanses itself to receive the man and his seed.
According to www.atihealth.net.com – “During sexual excitement, droplets of fluid appear along the vaginal walls and eventually cover the sides of the vagina completely. The vaginal tissue does not contain any secretory glands itself, but is loaded with blood vessels, which when engorged as a result of sexual arousal, press against the tissue, forcing natural tissue fluids through the walls of the vagina.”
What amazing design by a loving and perfect God! Yes, every detail was planned and set in order for the union of the male and female, when God created man! Adam’s help mate was created perfectly to receive and unite with him! Nothing was left to chance! When Adam woke from sleep and saw his help mate, he knew what God had done, the purpose of what had been done, and what it was to mean in the future.

Genesis 2:23+24 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
24. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Notice that there was no question in Adam’s mind as to what was to take place from that time on. He stated as fact, that after this a man ‘shall’ - not might want to, or might make the choice to, or might like the idea of, or find this to be one option of many - but ‘SHALL’ leave his father and mother and cleave, or that is, glue to or attach himself to his wife and the two; the man and his wife, the male and the female, would be one flesh. It was not necessary for God to tell us that He does not mean for animal and man, male and male or female and female to become one flesh, for He clearly stated what was to be. He was very clear when he stated that a man and his wife were to be joined together and become one flesh.
IF GOD HAS SAID HOW IT IS TO BE – IT IS ENOUGH!

Matt. 19:6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What God hath joined together, let no man put asunder.

What did God join together? Male and female, man and wife!
Notice it says, “no more” and these are not hard words to understand - not ever again! Do you notice that the union of the man and woman is said here to be something that God has done? It was He who joined them together. Again, it is shown, that this was God’s own design and plan and that He takes it very seriously. Why? Well for one very good reason, this was HIS image; HIS reflection on the earth. When God created man in his own image, male and female created he them! He was not going to approve a breaking up or distortion of His own image! Take a look at Genesis 5:1+2 –

1 This is the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God
(Elohiym) made he him. 2 Male and female created he them, and blessed them and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.

On the day that God created man, he created them male and female and called both of them by one name – Adam! Some Bible translations have left out the words “called their name” and just said something like “called them man, or human, or mankind. But I consider this a dangerous error. In the Hebrew, the word for ‘name’ is shem; … through the idea of definite and conspicuous position; ...]; an appellation, as a mark of individuality; by impl. honor, …
According to the dictionary, appellation is – 1. The act of appealing; appeal 2. the act of calling by name 3. the word by which a particular person or thing is called and known; name; title; designation. [1913 Webster] It seems that God was not just speaking of humankind in general but was calling the man and the woman by a particular name that would identify them, and that name was Adam. In other words, God called them both, who were one flesh, by only one name in the beginning.
It was a mark of individuality, as God saw them as one. This word ‘name’ is the same word used in Genesis 16:15, when Abram called his son’s name Ishmael. It is important to see the truth of this and to understand the extent that God considered the man and his wife to be one. I am not making too much of too little. Too often people have made too little of much. It is not wise to always skim over what is written in the Word of God. We need to take time to look closely at what is being said.
It was after the woman sinned that we read that Adam called his wife by a name separate from his own. Indeed because of sin, even today, husbands and wives often seek more for individual recognition, than the joining together as one, and self-denial for the love of their spouse.

Genesis 3:20 And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

Again, in Mark, God’s intention is made known.

Mark 10:8 And they twain (two) shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.

This agrees with what is written in Ephesians chapter 5.

Eph. 5:28+29 – “So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. 29. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh …”

Again, we see how serious God takes the marital union. Remember the marriage was to reflect the image of God.

John 10:30 I and my Father are one.
John 17:11 And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee.
Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are one.
John 17:22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:

First God created man in His image, the two to be one, as God the Father and Jesus Christ are one. Later, after salvation was brought by Jesus Christ, God called all those who were redeemed, his body and called for a oneness, or that is, to be unified; - each member as being part of the body of Christ; individual members a part of each other in Christ. Both were to have the Holy Spirit in their lives.
The truth of the Godhead; who is a composite yet singular God, who is the one and only true and living God, can be seen reflected in all of creation, but especially in the way He created man; male and female created He them!
Am I saying then, that God is both male and female? Not in the sense that we know it. Remember we are a reflection, not an exact duplicate. There are things in the make-up of feminine man that reflect certain aspects of God and His character to a greater degree and things in the make-up of the male that reflects other aspects of God to a greater degree. One alone is an incomplete image. But when the two are joined together there is a more complete whole and reflection of God.
There is blessing and there is peace in following God, honoring Him, His Word and His will. His will is seen when we look at what He did in the beginning; how and what He created. Walking in His Spirit, and his will, according to His plan and design, brings peace, for we are not at war with how He set things in motion.
Can you imagine, however, how Satan must have felt upon seeing God create an image of Himself and then to give them dominion over all the earth? Satan had tried to lift himself above God but failed. Now a position of authority and power is handed to the man without any effort on his part. Satan desires to rule, without seeing the image of God at every turn; having to watch him have what he wants for himself! It is no wonder he set about quickly to put a stop to both the image and the dominion! He is still working hard to keep mankind from understanding God or man’s purpose and power in Christ. Many have turned from God’s plan to live their own way, rejecting God and His design. Some do not even understand what they are doing, why it is wrong, nor the insult it is to God to pervert His image. But consider what happens when a man goes against the plan of God. This is vital information that Satan has hidden from multitudes.

Romans 1:7, 16-28 To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

You may not be in Rome, but are you beloved of God? Are you called to be a saint of God? Grace to you! Peace to you! This grace is, in the Greek, charis; graciousness (as gratifying), of manner or act (abstr. or concr.; lit. or fig. or especially the divine influence upon the heart, and its reflection in the life; including gratitude. May you have the peace of God and His divine influence upon your heart and may His influence be reflected in your life!

16. For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and to the Greek.
17. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written. The just shall live by faith. (Note; - The righteousness of God is revealed in the gospel of Jesus Christ!)
18. For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness.

The wrath of God is revealed against all unrighteousness and ungodliness.
Wrath = (Greek) orge, or-gay’; prop desire (as reaching forth or excitement of the mind), that is, (by anal.) violent passion (ire, or [justifiable] abhorrence); by impl. punishment:- anger, indignation, vengeance, wrath.
ungodliness = asebeia, as-eb’-i-a; impiety, that is, (by impl.) wickedness: – ungodly (-ness).
impiety = 1. The quality of being impious; irreverence toward the Supreme Being; ungodliness; wickedness. [1913 Webster]
hold = katecho, kat-ekh’-o; to hold down (fast), in various applications (lit. or fig.): – … possess, retain, … withhold.

WHY?

19. Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shown it unto them.
20. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

manifest = (Greek) phaneroo, fan-er-o’-o; to render apparent (lit. or fig.):- appear, manifestly declare, (make) manifest (forth), shew (self).
When a person does not show reverence and respect to God, this is ungodliness. Such an attitude and behavior result in the wrath of God. Wrath is more than being a little displeased but bespeaks of violent passion, abhorrence, vengeance, and punishment. What is it that stirs God so? It is the fact that man has the evidence of God and His power manifest or made known ‘in’ him and yet lives ungodly and unrighteously.
The evidence of how the human body is to function can be seen and understood. God's design is there, and the purpose is known. A physician can affirm the purposes of our body, whether Christian or not. Yes, the truth of God is right there inside of each of us! It is in our make-up. God and His eternal power; the things of God that we cannot see with our eyes, can be clearly seen and understood by the very things God has made; even the things from the creation of the world! So, there is no excuse to be irreverent toward God and to live with disrespect toward Him!
The invisible things of God are clearly seen and understood by the things that He made! We have already seen how God made man in His image in the beginning, and now we are told that what may be known of God is ‘in’ man. God wrote a story of himself in us!

Romans 1:21-27Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
23. And changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like unto corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

Notice it does not say that they had no understanding from the start, but contrariwise, they did know, but their heart became darkened. The truth of God is written within us, even if we have been told a lie that seemed very persuasive! Even if we search for reasons to believe something contrary to His truth.

24 Wherefore God gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves:

uncleanness = (Greek) akatharsia, ak-ath-ar-see’-ah; impurity (the quality) phys. or mor.: uncleaness.
Where did this lust come from? Their own hearts.
Man changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like unto corruptible man.
We have seen in 1 Cor. 11:7 that man is the glory of God. The eternal power and Godhead is to be seen in what God has made and He has made man in His image! Man is a reflection, an image, not an exact duplicate. When man is seen, a reflection of God is to be seen. If you change the image, you cause a distorted and untrue picture to be seen. But man took it upon himself to change the glory of the incorruptible God.
What foolish pride to try to change the glory of the incorruptible God  - into something on man’s level and of his own making, rather than to recognize the image of God that He has placed in us and to glorify Him for the magnificence of what He has done and for WHO HE IS!

25. Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

Who changed the truth of God into a lie! Do you hear the scriptures? This is exactly what perversion is! Pervert = To change something from its correct use or original purpose: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/pervert

Do you hear the scripture? Some may say that homosexual behavior is a private matter and hurts no one - or - no one but the participants. But this is a matter between God and the man He
created. These actions are calling God a liar! It is serving-self - man creating his own gods; worshiping what was created rather than God himself! When a person says, “God may have made it that way, but I want to go another way,” he is rebelling against God Himself.
Of course, the truth will always be the truth. We have heard it said that someone has twisted our words or changed what we have said. What was said, was said. This cannot really be changed. But it can be misrepresented or lied about. Man has taken it upon himself to turn away from the true image of God as is to be seen in the marital union of man and woman and to proclaim that it is just as acceptable; that it is justifiable to have union, man with man or woman with woman, thus changing the truth; perverting the image, - changing the truth of who? Changing the truth of God into a lie!
This is giving oneself a position above God, His divine plan, will, and purpose! If you had a beautiful portrait of your late mother, who was a refined, modest lady, hanging in your house; a picture that expressed, not only her physical beauty but also seemed to reflect the loving, caring person she had been, you would not appreciate someone coming in and altering the picture. If someone were to paint a bottle of whiskey in her hand, a cigarette hanging from her lip, rips in her dress and hair in her face, you would likely be furious! Not only had the picture been destroyed, but the character and heart of your mother slandered. Her image was perverted!
But for man, the image of God is to be reflected in himself. To pervert that image is serving-self over God. We find that in the worship of other gods, that are not Jehovah God, often homosexual activities have been involved. As they chose not to honor the creator, they defiled His image in their heathen worship. An article on connelodonovan.com says this – The worship of Horned Apollo includes ecstatic naked dancing and feats of acrobatics (including an early form of two-man ritual volleyball with a bright purple ball!) followed by sex performed by young men.
According to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, concerning homosexuality in ancient Greece – in classic antiquity writers such as Herodotus, Plato, Xenophon, Athenaeus, and many others explored aspects of same-sex love in ancient Greece. The wide-spread and socially significant form of same-sex sexual relations in ancient Greece were between adult men and pubescent or adolescent boys, known as pederasty. (However, marriages in Ancient Greece between men and women were also age structured, with men in their 30s commonly taking wives in their early teens.) Though homosexual relationships between adult men did exist, at least one member of each of these relationships flouted social conventions by assuming a passive sexual role. It is unclear how such relations between women were regarded in general society, but examples do exist as far back as the time of Sappho.

Rom. 1:26. For this cause God gave them up to vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

change = (Greek) - , met-al-las’-so; to exchange: – change.
natural = (Greek) - phusikos, foo-see-kos’; “physical”, that is (by impl.) instinctive: – natural.
use = (Greek) - cabak; chersis, Khray’-sis; employment, that is (specially) sexual intercourse (as an occupation of the body): – use
nature = (Greek) - phusis, foo’-sis; growth (by germination or expansion), that is, (by impl.) natural production (lineal descent); by extens. a genus or sort; fig. native disposition, constitution or usage: – ([man-]) kind, nature ([-al]).
Here a person might be quick to say that natural use would be that which is natural or instinctive to an individual. So then, if homosexuality is natural to a person, it is acceptable. But in truth, the scripture is saying quite the opposite, for it is speaking of women – exchanging - a natural use for something that is against nature. What should have been natural to them is rejected and they have embraced an alternative lifestyle.
It must always be accepted when speaking of ‘nature’ - scripturally speaking - that God is the basis for all truth. Nature must be understood to be (as seen in the definition) the natural, or that is, God-given production: what God himself produced, that is, designed and created. Otherwise, there is no foundation for truth at all.
A serial rapist can say that raping victims comes naturally to him. Whatever a person gives himself over to and makes a habit of doing may come to seem natural to him. This can be especially so if it was developed as a child. If a tiny child learns to lie and gets by with it, after he is grown, he may never remember a time when he did not lie and so say that it is natural to him. But God did not create us to lie.
If a person is abused at a very young age, when he is older, he may not be able to remember what he was like before this happened to him. Though he may become shy and fearful, he may have once been light-hearted and confident before the abuse took place. However, he may not be able to remember ever feeling joyful or confident.
God is obviously speaking of an exchange. There was something that was natural, or according to the design of God in the woman’s very body, but she decided to exchange that for something that was not. God created the woman to receive the man physically and the seed of the man. He stated that her union was to be with man; that they were to cease being two and become one. Her body naturally produces ovum that are ready to unite with the sperm of the man, then be planted in her womb, thus treasuring and valuing the seed of man and life itself. This is the design of God and so it is natural and fitting to her design.
If she exchanges this natural use, for something else, turning away from the male to find sexual pleasure in another way, she is going against nature, or, that is to say, against God’s own design and purpose. There are Lesbians who desire to carry a child in their womb and have children of their own, even though they have rejected the natural use of the man. It is a part of their natural makeup to desire children. Some will get with a man just for the purpose of receiving his seed and having a child. Others will adopt a child. While she rejects the male as a partner, she cannot altogether ignore the design of the creator, for without the man she cannot bear a child! The result of women leaving the natural use of the man was that God gave them up to vile affections. A lesbian may want the seed of the man so that she can become pregnant and bear a child, but her affection is not for him. Her affections have become vile. God gave them over = (Greek) paradidomi; to surrender, that is, yield up, ….
What did he yield them up to? Vile affections. Vile = (Greek) atimia; infamy, that is comparative indignity, (obj.) disgrace: – dishonour, reproach, shame, vile.
Affections = (Greek) pathos; prop. suffering, (“pathos”), that is (subj.) a passion (espec. concupiscence): – (inordinate) affection, lust.
God surrendered them over to passions, lust, suffering, and inordinate affections, that were vile, or that is, shameful.
Inordinate In-or-di-nate.  … Not limited to rules prescribed, or to usual bounds; irregular; excessive; immoderate; as, an inordinate love of the world. [1913 Webster]
Merriam-Webster – definition of inordinate = 1. archaic: disorderly, unregulated 2. exceeding reasonable limits: immoderate
These affections that God gave them up to were ‘inordinate,’ that is, they were not limited to prescribed rules or bounds, which God himself had put in place. They did not honor God or respect His image; the reflection of himself on earth! They were irregular, excessive and immoderate, all of which are opposite of God. Doesn’t this sound like the belief system of our day and age? How many proclaim that they should have no rules or boundaries, but only do as they please, without having to concern themselves with God?

27. And likewise also their men, leaving the natural use of the woman burned in their lust one toward another: men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves the recompense of their error which was meet.

Here again, we have the leaving of the God-given, natural use, designed into man’s being, for something other than God’s intention. “Likewise,” or that is, similarly to what the women did, men (Greek arrhen= male) were leaving (Greek aphiemi= … forsake, to lay aside, leave) the natural use of the woman.
It would seem that a person must have a strong need to change the truth of God, or a fear of facing their own true condition, to deny what is clearly written in Genesis about the natural use of the woman, or to deny nature; that which her body is clearly designed for.
No reasoning will change the fact of the woman’s body including her hormones. Any medical doctor can tell us what the womb, vagina, and ovaries etc. are for. To deny these facts is to let your foolish heart be darkened.
But the men being spoken of in these scriptures had chosen to forsake the God-given use of the woman and do something else instead, something of their own choosing. They burned in their lust, man for man.
Burned (Greek) = to inflame deeply: – burn.
Lust (Greek) = excitement of the mind, that is, longing after: lust.
If this was not God’s intended use, then it is an idea that comes from His adversary, who surely must hate the idea of seeing the image of God spread across the earth. Whether through divorce, heterosexual, or homosexual fornication, or worse, he has worked hard at destroying that image; keeping it from ever being seen or understood, and/or perverting it completely. Through assaults on children that confuse their understanding of who they are and what their bodies are meant for, through lies and deception, by pornography and its shocking effect on the human psyche, playing havoc with the emotions, hormones, and mental understanding etc. He has worked diligently to keep the image of God from being known and God himself from being honored.
These men burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working that which is unseemly and not glorifying God in their bodies, which are supposed to belong to the Lord.
working (Greek) = to work fully, that is, accomplish; by implication, to finish, fashion: – cause, do (deed), perform, work (out).
unseemly (Greek) aschemosune = an indecency; by implication the pudenda: – shame, that which is unseemly.
Merriam-Webster – definition of - pudendum - the external genital organs as a human being and especially of a woman – usually used in plural pudenda.
It is interesting to see that in the definition of the word ‘unseemly’ includes the word pudenda, which is the external genital organs, or organs of generation. They performed, with their pudenda, that which was indeed indecent; that which was against ‘nature;' the design of God.
There is no valuable use for the sperm, in the homosexual act. God’s purpose is set aside, forsaken, left. The life-giving sperm that should be appreciated and respected, for which God had prepared a place, a garden in which to be planted, is, in the homosexual act, discarded as so much waste.
God prepared a self-cleansing place for the male penis to enter and give his seed, but in the homosexual act, again and again, it is thrust into a place God prepared for dung to pass through and be discarded. What a fitting insult to God the creator. It is as if to say, I reject the image that was to be reflected in me, your image. I reject my ability to father. I reject your purpose. I not only disrespect and disregard the life-giving flow you supplied my body with, but I cast it into the place of uncleanness made for dung! I will never honor you or your image with it! No! I will not retain the knowledge of my creator and reflect Him in my body or be the image he created me to be!
Having worked that which is unseemly, or that is, shameful with the pudenda, these men receive in themselves the recompense (compensation) of their error which was meet. They received the compensation that is as it should be.
God’s Word tell us that our body is for the Lord and He is for our body

1Cor. 6:13, 18 +20 … Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.
18 Flee fornication …
20. For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.

Yet their bodies, which were for the Lord, in which they were to glorify Him and in which his Spirit was to live, were not used for this purpose. They claimed ownership of their bodies, making themselves their own Gods, honoring their own vile lusts and seeking whatever pleasure they could find. They used their bodies to pervert the image of God while glorifying themselves. The result was -

Romans 1:28. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient.

Notice it does not say that God gave them a reprobate mind. Rather that He surrendered them
to, or yielded them up, to that which they had chosen.
What is a reprobate mind? reprobate = (Greek) unapproved, that is, rejected; by impl. worthless (lit. or moral): – cast away, rejected, reprobate.
The word ‘mind’ here is = (Greek) nous; the intellect, that is, mind (divine or human; in thought, feeling, or will); by implication meaning – mind, understanding.
They did not like to retain God in their knowledge. The word ‘knowledge; here means (Gr.); recognition, that is, (by implication) full discernment, acknowledgment: – (ac) knowledge (-ing – ment). They did not like to retain God in their full discernment or their understanding. Remember that the invisible things of God can be clearly seen by that which is made, and God is manifest ‘in’ us. But these did not like to retain a clear image of God, who and what He is, as represented in the creation of His image – MAN. So, He yielded them up to those things that are not convenient.
There are those who desire to be Christian and to praise and worship God in various ways, while retaining a homosexual identity, or while living in heterosexual fornication. But those who believe they are doing so are deceived. We cannot truly worship and honor a creator, who we refuse to acknowledge for who and what He is.
He is light and light has no fellowship with darkness. Those who have done and lived in the actions described in Romans chapter one, have dishonored God and not been willing, and/or not known how to fully retain Him in their knowledge and have dishonored themselves as well.
It is no wonder that it may be hard for a homosexual to grasp and fully accept the words of scripture as given here, if they have been given over to a mind that is separated from God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. They have a mind that on the one hand, is determined to have its own way and be a God unto itself, while still wanting to honor the God of the universe and it cannot be done.

Isaiah 42:8 I am the LORD: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.

These are double-minded people who are unstable in all their ways.

James 1:8 A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

They are blind because they refuse to perceive God as He is.

Matthew 15:14 … And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

Yet anyone who will come into agreement with the Word of God, whether fully understood or not; who will say “Let God be truth and every man a liar” has the opportunity of being healed from unnatural ways they have gone against God.
First, they must agree with God, acknowledge the error of their ways and repent. Then and only then can they be delivered and healed.
This is not to say that all who have lived in error have done so with a conscious intention to go against God, or that they even know how their condition came about. Still, it is vital to come into agreement with God and His Word and humble one’s self before Him, in order to receive forgiveness and deliverance.

Acts 3:19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come in the presence of the Lord;

The lifestyle a person has lived may have been the result of things done to them at such a young age, they cannot even clearly recall the immediate effect of the act; including the fear, confusion, and pain. When Satan attacks a person, he desires to hurt and win a victory over God. He knows how God loves His creation, and he wants to keep them from comprehending God as He is, or seeing God’s
reflection in themselves and others on the earth.
But God is a supernatural God. It doesn’t matter how much you think you have tried to change, or to the contrary, how much you have attempted to convince yourself that the thoughts and lusts you have, that go against the Word of God, are really acceptable to Him. God remains unchanged, and His Word will endure forever. He is still able to heal, change, and deliver you; to help you become the person you were meant to be. He will help you come to know the real you, you have never yet known. Many have never known who they were really meant to be or how to live free from the bondages which they cannot shake and that have been there for as long as they can remember. Still, God’s ability to restore you has never diminished. He is willing and able to save to the uttermost and to give you the peace of God that passes all understanding.

Heb. 7:25 Wherefore he is able to save to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing that he ever liveth to make intercession for them.
Romans 3:4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar, as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

AMEN! SO BE IT! PRAISE GOD FOR ALL TIME!

Saturday, November 3, 2018

Boundaries of Love - Being a fool is not a requirement of love.

Boundaries of Love - Being a fool is not a requirement of love.

There is a difference in caring for everyone, going out into the highways and byways to tell the good news of salvation to one and all, and in taking everyone into your company. There are boundaries of love. God not only knew this but insisted upon these boundaries. Although Jesus sent disciples to spread the gospel, God told His people to separate themselves from those involved in sinful behaviors because of the influence of ungodly living. He made clear that light and dark have no fellowship (partnership). It is one thing to love every person of every persuasion, to be willing to assist anyone in need and another thing to embrace them as though their lifestyles are acceptable and do not bother you.
Parents who love their children know this only too well. While they may not want their children to be rude or unkind to anyone, neither do they want their children to hang out with those who are defiant to their teachers and who are troublemakers, involved in drugs, or illegal activities. It's easy to understand. A parent loves his child and knows that if he spends too much time with the wrong sort, he may be influenced to try things that are not good for him or to be used and abused. Love makes a parent want to protect his child from harmful influences. So he sets boundaries of love.
You may say you're not afraid of snakes. Good for you. But if you are wise, you will know which ones are poisonous and how to avoid their bite. You will not lie down to sleep with a venomous snake.
But there is a push today to not even acknowledge that there is any behavior that we can see as 'bad.' It is called 'unloving,' or 'judgmental' to recognize anything as evil. Except that the one thing we can call evil is recognizing evil to be evil. If you recognize it and stand against it, then that is what we are told is evil. This 'love all,' 'accept all' philosophy is convenient to those who want to push an agenda. It is also convenient for those who would proselytize and subjugate the minds of others. And it is convenient for those who want to get by with their evil works without suffering consequences.
Even for a Christian to make a stand to agree with God, he is considered judgmental and condemning. Scriptures are thrown out there that tell us not to judge, by those who do not understand that this has nothing to do with agreeing with God's judgment.
God has already judged what is right and what is wrong and He has laid it out for all who will receive the truth. The world is already condemned because of its sin.
We are not to play God and impose our own judgments that are outside of what God has brought forth. We are to show others how they can, through Jesus Christ, come out from under the condemnation they are already living with.
But Satan has played a cunning mind-game to immobilize the true children of God, to desensitize them to his poison and to bring them into bondage.
A parent knows instinctively that love causes him to want to protect his child from dangerous influences and a wise parent teaches his child how to avoid those influence. But how soon is that simple, natural instinct, born out of love, shamed and cut off from adult understanding in so many areas of life?!
Protection of our country from enemies who want to come in and defile it, abuse it, and change it into a place where the government it has is replaced with one that pleases the selfish and those who wish to rule others, is now called unloving! How can such idiotic thinking be understood? People are even trying to find scriptures to justify this mindset.
Paul, in 1 Corinthians chapter five, shamed the church for keeping an individual in their congregation who claimed to be a 'brother' but was practicing a despicable sin. He told them that a little leaven (yeast) would leaven the whole lump. In other words, the person practicing this ungodliness would affect the whole church. He made it clear they were to turn him out of the church. This may be shocking to those who think and spread the idea, that love in Christianity could never do such a thing but must be ooshy gooshy sweetness at all times. No! This was a boundary of love. The one practicing his sin could continue it elsewhere without the pretense that he was okay. The rest of the church could pray for him, love him and even be kind to him, but not pretend his actions were acceptable nor allow it to influence their children. Sometimes love must be tough.
Now we are supposed to believe that if we are Christians, our love will keep us from protecting our country from those who might come here intent on resisting our laws and even trafficking our children. It is said that if we want such protection, we are scared and acting out of fear. Fear, lack of love, unfeeling, selfishness, etc. are convenient labels to be put on those who wish to live in wisdom.
Be that as it may, the very idea of vetting well each immigrant and not letting anyone come into our country who does not do so legally and well vetted is cried out against. It is as though the person who wants to enter our country is more important than individual families, including our children who live here, and as though our wanting to maintain safety and peace for our children is somehow wrong, or worse is only senseless fear. It is amazing when good sense and wisdom are redefined as foolish fear.
The Bible says to love your enemies. It does not say to pretend they are not your enemies. They are, in fact, recognized as enemies. How do you know you are loving your enemy, if you do not know who your enemy is? Love him, but do not be a fool. An enemy is someone who works against you and/or to destroy you. Pray for him. Do not return evil for evil. But neither allow him to destroy you. Seek God that your enemy become your friend. But until he does, you do not let your enemy destroy you! God has given us weapons of spiritual warfare for a reason. Being a fool is not a requirement of love. And drawing of a line in the sand that is based on wisdom and understanding does not mean you are afraid. As a matter of fact, you may well be unafraid, because you know that you have placed boundaries of safety and love firmly in place. A fool, however, has many reasons to be afraid.


Saturday, September 22, 2018

Come, Let Us Reason



Where's the Respect For the Adult, Professional, Psychologist, Woman, Christine Ford is Said to Be?
Why Treat an Accomplished, Overcoming, Adult Woman, Who is a Professor, Like a Child?
Where is Reason?
I am an adult woman. I am not cold-hearted. I am a sensitive person. This, however does not mean that I did not have the ability to grow in maturity and wisdom from my youth until now. We are hearing all sorts of emotional rants concerning Christine Ford and what she may be going through since her allegations against Brett Kavanaugh were made public. Now as a thinking, reasoning adult, it only stands to reason to me, that between the age of approximately 15 (approximate since she does not know the year her assault was supposed to have taken place) and now, 36 years later, Mrs. Ford has also had time to grow and mature. Which seems apparent as she is a psychologist and professor of statistics at Palo Alto University. And she has worked as a research psychologist for Stanford University's Department of Psychiatry (https://en.wikipedia.org/)
Psychology is - (Dictionary.com) - 1. the science of the mind or of mental states and processes. 2. the science of human and animal behavior
In other words. Mrs Ford has had training in the human psyche. Of course, this does not mean that she is exempt from suffering herself. But it does suggest that as an adult and a professor who has studied in this field, and also with the political climate at this time, she would be well aware of what the consequences of making public such an allegation could be. I am not saying any of this to make light of her pain and suffering, or to suggest it does not still affect her life, if indeed it did take place, but simply to say that 36 years after the fact and with all of her knowledge of the human psyche, she would have a good idea of what to expect.
Some may say they understand why a victim of such abuse will put off reporting the matter. And I would imagine that if anyone understands the psychology of this, it should be Christine Ford, the psychologist.
However, while understanding the psychology and the result of emotional trauma on the victim, it is also reasonable that Mrs. Ford would have an idea of the psychological response and political reaction that would likely take place once she spoke out.
So then, it stands to reason that she would know beforehand that there would be a demand for proof of her allegations and that she would be expected to be asked to face the accused and state her accusation. Being a woman, having suffered emotional and psychological pain, will not eliminate the process to be expected when you make such an allegation. A woman of her age and stature would know this. She would also know that making an allegation against such a public figure would stir empathy and sympathy, but also anger and outrage. None of this would be a surprise to her.
It is not as though she is making this allegation a few days after the supposed incident, while she is only fifteen and the whole emotional, terrifying event is fresh on her mind and she is not thinking straight. No, it is 36 years later, after she has had time to seek mental and emotional help, get training in the field of the mind and emotions and to think things through and have a pretty good idea what she is going to face when she speaks out.
Brett Kavanaugh has been in public office for many years. At any time in the 36 years since Mrs. Ford says Mr. Kavanaugh was supposed to have molested her, she could have reported him or brought up charges against him.
As the knowledgeable professor that she is, she would know ahead of time, that she could not expect to simply throw out this serious accusation, go into hiding, and expect to be able to manipulate the legal process to suit her. She would know that without full proof of her claim, her charge would not hold. She would know that she would be expected to have to state her case and let the accused know clearly what the accusations against him were.
So why the game? Why state that she wants to come public, then say she is not ready? I give her too much credit as an intelligent psychologist and reasoning adult to not have already expected to have to face the music as soon as she made her allegations. To cry that she is being bullied, or mistreated, when she is offered a fair hearing, I find to be ridiculous. To expect the whole country to be put on hold while you try to prepare yourself to tell the only truth you know and that you should have known to be prepared for before you opened your mouth is not reasonable. I choose to give her credit for being a professional woman. She has been offered a private hearing. She has been told they will come to her in a private place. She has been treated respectfully and delicately. She has not claimed rape. She claims to not know when the incident occurred, or where it occurred. She has given no serious evidence that can be examined. She has made her claim and then been uncooperative.
She is not a child. Respecting her as a mature, educated, professional woman, trained in psychology, means to me, to expect her to behave as such. To expect her to act as a frail, young, unknowing, unexpecting teenager who had no idea what she was about to face, is, in my view, not treating her as she ought to be treated.
Certainly, once she made her move, she may have been flooded with unexpected emotions. But as a psychologist, I would think she should have known this was a possibility. She had 36 years to come to the decision to speak out and had enough knowledge and understanding to know she would have to buck up and do what was needed. It is time to stop the games. If you are going to go to battle, even knowing you are in the right, you know you will have to fight the fight. So take a deep breath, go out there and cooperate and get the job done, or make it clear once and for all you have changed your mind. No more talk of her needing more time. She has had 36 years.